Skip to main content

WINNABLE CASE





Salam,

1) Actually the accused was charged under Section 304(b) Penal Code i.e culpable homicide not amounting to murder (2nd limb) which carries maximum imprisonment of ten years. Compared to a murder case under Section 302 it carries the death sentence. Initially when we were appointed for any case, its always good to assess the chances of winning the case. By doing that we will know from the outset what the best options to the client are; be it to fight the case, ask for reduction or straight away plea guilty if the prosecution’s case is overwhelmingly strong and watertight. As for this particular case, I have confident that the outcome will be favorable to the defense .


2) Don’t be confused between the term ‘victim’ and ‘accused’. In a criminal trial, victim refers to the person who are assumed to be the one suffered, in this case is the man who died. As for the term accused it refers to the person preferred with the charge and directed to answer it. Section 304 (b) falls under ‘non-bailable’ offence like a rape case or a robbery case. It simply means bail can still be given but the court has discretion to allow it judiciously. There are two other categories; ‘bailable’ offense and ‘unbailable’ offense. Bailable refers to minor offences where bail is given as of right like causing hurt etc. Unbailable offences are offences whereby bail is denied by specific statutes; e.g offences under Dangerous Drugs Act and under Firearms Increased Penalties Act.


3) Personally there’s no harm done if students wish to see and interview experts after all this case is already completed. Having said that, it depends on the experts themselves whether they are willing or bot. what happened in this case was the cause of death for the deceased was cardiac arrest which turns out to be one of the major consideration for the court when it decided that there was no prima facie case made out by the prosecution.


4) True, this case took about 2 years to be disposed off. Justice delayed is indeed justice denied but justice hurried is also justice buried. As for me it is a balance between this 2 extremes so that justice will be dispensed with the soonest but without compromising right to be heard and the quality of parties performing their respective duties.


5) Off course there is always room for improvement for everything including our justice system. It must come from within the parties themselves; that their duty whether as prosecutors, judges or lawyers is to uphold justice first and comply with KPI second. Efforts by all to improve the standard and quality in performing task will help greatly in the smooth sailing of justice system. More understanding and tolerance between parties also will catapult the system so that the erosion of confidence in the public eyes will significantly reduced.


These answers were given in response to a list of questionnaires given to me by journalism students who happened to witness one of my trial.


Wassalam.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MITIGASI KES SEKSYEN 39A(2) AKTA DADAH BERBAHAYA

Dengan izin Yang Arif,
Hujahkan mahkamah yang mulia ini perlu mempertimbangkan beberapa faktor sebelum menjatuhkan satu hukuman yang adil.
1. Pengakuan salah Pengakuan salah ini bukan sahaja menjimatkan masa dan kos mahkamah, juga pihak-pihak lain iaitu pendakwaan dan saksiWalaupun pengakuan ini dibuat di peringkat pembelaan, masih lagi perlu dipertimbangkan kerana ia dibuat "at the earliest opportunity" dan dalam keadaan berat dadah yang bukan "substantial"PP v Ravindran & Ors [1993] 1 MLJ 452. Latar belakang OKT
Semasa ditangkap berusia 34 tahun dan bersekolah sehingga darjah 6 sahajaBelum berkahwin dan merupakan anak ke 3 dari 7 orang adik-beradikSebelum ditangkap bekerja sebagai peniaga pasar dengan upah harian sebanyak RM 30Ibu dan bapa masih hidup dan sudah uzur 3. Fakta kes
Daripada fakta kes yang telah sedia ada di hadapan mahkamah yang mulia ini, OKT telah memberikan kerjasama kepada pihak polis sehingga membawa kepada perjumpaan dadahTerdapat 5 lagi tangka…

VIRAL

Assalam,
Baru sahaja kes yang saya kendalikan iaitu satu kes bunuh telah diputuskan oleh Mahkamah. Keputusannya Mahkamah dapati pihak pendakwaan telah berjaya membuktikan kes melampaui keraguan munasabah. Tewas dalam sesuatu perbicaraan bukanlah sesuatu yang tidak dijangka. Ada kes yang kita yakin boleh menang berakhir dengan kekalahan. Sebaliknya, ada kes yang kita berasa tidak ada peluang, namun akhirnya adalah kejayaan. 

Sebagai manusia biasa, peguam juga boleh beremosi bila tewas. Perasaan ralat, persoalan samada patutkah aku buat dengen lebih baik dan macam-macam lagi menyerbu diri. Apatah lagi jika yang tidak berjaya itu kes yang viral dan expected by majority of netizens to be a sure 99.9% win. Peguam namun mesti professional dan memahami bahawa tugas kita adalah untuk memastikan sistem keadilan tertegak. Jika itu dipasak dalam hati, maka kita tak perlu gundah gulana atau memurungkan diri.
Hakikatnya, kerjaya peguam terutamanya peguam jenayah bukanlah berpaksikan win-loss record. …

ADA APA DENGAN REPRESENTASI

Salam,
Representasi adalah satu perkataan keramat yang selalu diungkapkan dalam arena kepeguaman jenayah. Terkadang, ia umpama satu penawar atau antidot yang teringin sangat didengar oleh telinga sang tertuduh yang saban hari dicengkam jeriji besi. Mereka yang tertekan samada tekanan kehidupan penjara yang serba menyesakkan itu, ataupun tekanan akibat ketidakpastian dalam hidup mereka. Berapa lamakah lagi aku akan hidup, adakah cahaya di hujung terowong ataupun adakah nyawaku akan berakhir di tali gantung.
Representasi sudah menjadi common word dan judicial notice bahkan di kalangan orang awam. Walaupun kadang-kadang sebutannya silap seperti ada yang menyebutnya lepresentasi atau represent atau lebih canggih lagi rap sahaja. Pokok pangkalnya, harapan yang disandarkan pada keajaiban representasi oleh seorang peguam jenayah begitu tinggi, bahkan dianggap boleh menyelamatkan nyawa.
Let's get the record straight. Pertamanya, menulis surat representasi samada memohon pertuduhan lebih ring…